<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Silent Score for a Sound Movie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://destination-out.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://destination-out.com/?p=735</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:25:19 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herb Levy</title>
		<link>http://destination-out.com/?p=735&#038;cpage=1#comment-93935</link>
		<dc:creator>Herb Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://destination-out.com/?p=735#comment-93935</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m old enough to have seen the movie and heard the album when they were released back in the day &amp; I&#039;ve seen &amp; heard them more recently. 

My sense of what might actually have happened is that Coleman didn&#039;t make music cues to support the moods of specific scenes in the movie. He just provided Rooks with about 80 minutes of music in twenty minute chunks for a movie that runs about 80 minutes. 

There really would have been no way for Rooks to have used the score that Coleman provided without chopping it up into very short pieces so that the film&#039;s dialog, sound effects, etc could also be heard. 

If Rooks had done that to Coleman&#039;s score, you&#039;d be writing a blog post about how Rooks had done a disservice to Coleman&#039;s music by deleting most of it. Rooks couldn&#039;t have known at the time that the music wouldn&#039;t get released well and would be considered one of Coleman&#039;s most fugitive records. 

Still, I think Rooks made the right decision: better to be known as someone who couldn&#039;t figure out how to cut up a long work by a master musician without losing most of it than to be known as the guy who DID cut it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m old enough to have seen the movie and heard the album when they were released back in the day &amp; I&#8217;ve seen &amp; heard them more recently. </p>
<p>My sense of what might actually have happened is that Coleman didn&#8217;t make music cues to support the moods of specific scenes in the movie. He just provided Rooks with about 80 minutes of music in twenty minute chunks for a movie that runs about 80 minutes. </p>
<p>There really would have been no way for Rooks to have used the score that Coleman provided without chopping it up into very short pieces so that the film&#8217;s dialog, sound effects, etc could also be heard. </p>
<p>If Rooks had done that to Coleman&#8217;s score, you&#8217;d be writing a blog post about how Rooks had done a disservice to Coleman&#8217;s music by deleting most of it. Rooks couldn&#8217;t have known at the time that the music wouldn&#8217;t get released well and would be considered one of Coleman&#8217;s most fugitive records. </p>
<p>Still, I think Rooks made the right decision: better to be known as someone who couldn&#8217;t figure out how to cut up a long work by a master musician without losing most of it than to be known as the guy who DID cut it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrG</title>
		<link>http://destination-out.com/?p=735&#038;cpage=1#comment-93915</link>
		<dc:creator>mrG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 04:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://destination-out.com/?p=735#comment-93915</guid>
		<description>God bless Pirate Bay: http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4219678/Chappaqua_(1969)_Conrad_Rooks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God bless Pirate Bay: <a href="http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4219678/Chappaqua_(1969)_Conrad_Rooks" rel="nofollow">http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4219678/Chappaqua_(1969)_Conrad_Rooks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yulun</title>
		<link>http://destination-out.com/?p=735&#038;cpage=1#comment-93882</link>
		<dc:creator>Yulun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://destination-out.com/?p=735#comment-93882</guid>
		<description>Wow! Fantastic stuff!  I saw the album cover (different than the one you posted, one with Ornette) exhibited at the Museum of Modern Art last year when they had their series on jazz soundtracks in film. I wondered what in the world this record was and have wanted to hear it since. Alas, the movie was not shown in that series. Not surprising given that it ended up not having any Ornette at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Fantastic stuff!  I saw the album cover (different than the one you posted, one with Ornette) exhibited at the Museum of Modern Art last year when they had their series on jazz soundtracks in film. I wondered what in the world this record was and have wanted to hear it since. Alas, the movie was not shown in that series. Not surprising given that it ended up not having any Ornette at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://destination-out.com/?p=735&#038;cpage=1#comment-93881</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://destination-out.com/?p=735#comment-93881</guid>
		<description>no, sanders appears on well under 50% of the album. it&#039;s mostly a long-form showcase for ornette&#039;s playing, and as such probably unparalleled in his discography.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, sanders appears on well under 50% of the album. it&#8217;s mostly a long-form showcase for ornette&#8217;s playing, and as such probably unparalleled in his discography.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
