
UNIVERSAL CONSCIOUSNESS
OH ALLAH
Alice Coltrane
Universal Consciousness
Impulse : 1971
![]()
AC, organ and harp; Leroy Jenkins, violin; John Blair, violin; Julius Brand, violin; Joan Kalisch, violin; Jimmy Garrison, bass; Jack DeJohnette, drums. String arrangements by AC; transcription by Ornette Coleman.
“Is jazz dead? That all depends on what you know.” –Lester Bowie
“A higher consciousness is attainable to all.” –Alice Coltrane
Hey, we’re back. How’ve you been?
Seems we’ve missed a lot of renewed talk lately about that old saw, The Death of Jazz. It started with Terry Teachout’s salvo in the Wall Street Journal, where he noted some alarming findings from the NEA’s most recent Survey of Public Participation in the Arts. (You can also check the survey questionnaire as used by the pollsters.) Teachout called out two themes: the rapid graying of the jazz audience, and the ever-shrinking jazz audience. He also noted jazz’s migration — completed long ago — from “pop” to “art” (damn, these labels are tired), on a cultural par with classical music, and facing many of the same challenges. And the discussion continued on various blogs and even spilled onto the radio airwaves, where Teachout and Vijay Iyer, among others, discussed the problems facing the form.
We agree and acknowledge that these aren’t the brightest times for jazz — and traditional culture consumption in general — but not it’s because there’s a lack of outstanding music being created right now. There’s no shortage of superlative work coming in from all generations – countless younger artists including Vijay Iyer, Steve Lehman, Taylor Ho Bynum, Darcy James Argue, The Bad Plus, Ben Perowsky, Tyshawn Sorey; established godhead figures like Henry Threadgill and Matthew Shipp; and the titans who still stride the earth such as Cecil Taylor, Anthony Braxton, and Ornette Coleman. Not to speak of those musicians who are simply not our our radar yet.
Teachout harps on figures showing that jazz’s audience is rapidly graying, but what he neglects to mention is how the music has started to seep into more populist forms as never before. But it’s not the classicist Lincoln Center brand of the music that’s proved robustly viral, but a strand of jazz that has almost been written out of the tradition altogether. Its most recent avatar: Alice Coltrane.
It’s true: Radiohead has cited Alice Coltrane’s music – and her album Universal Consciousness, in particular – as a primary influence on their experimental textures and inventive string arrangements. They also played her music before some of their concerts.
Stranger still: Metal drone masters SUNN O))) pay direct tribute to Alice Coltrane on “Alice,” the blissful last track on their excellent new album Monoliths & Dimensions (Southern Lord) — which features performances from trombonist Julian Priester, among other guests.

More metalhead love for Alice Coltrane this year: OM’s new album God is Good (Drag City) opens with a tamboura drone that nods directly to her classic Journey in Satchidananda.
While it’s obvious that jazz isn’t getting enough of the institutional support it deserves, or the grassroots swell it needs, that isn’t any indication of the genre’s sterility. We agree wholeheartedly with Vijay when he states that the problem isn’t the music’s lack of accessibility, but lack of access to an audience. There’s a shameful dearth of clubs and other venues across the country for jazz musicians to court new audiences.
And potential new – and young — audiences for jazz are out there. They’re absorbing the music filtered through the prisms of Radiohead, SUNN O))), OM — as well as others like Yo La Tengo, Fourtet, Yoko Ono, and countless electronic and hip hop acts. The so-called kids are responding to the fragments of jazz they hear (just like always), but they don’t often know where to go next.
There’s no one easy solution to this problem. But here’s a modest proposal to institutions like Lincoln Center — instead of thinking the kids will thrill to some Count Basie, how about appealing to them through the jazz they’ve already been exposed to? Where’s something like the Alice Coltrane program? Where’s the weeklong Electric Miles events? Why aren’t we taking advantage of the bridges that already exist? There’s obviously nothing wrong with Basie but you’ve got reach people where they’re at, not where you want them to be. They’ll get to Basie in their own time, provided you win them over in the first place. As Teachout wrote, “Any symphony orchestra that thinks it can appeal to under-30 listeners by suggesting that they should like Schubert and Stravinsky has already lost the battle.”
Despite Teachout’s strenuous attempts, during the radio program, to keep the focus on the inarguable data from the NEA survey rather than stooping to emotional appeals or mere anecdote, we heartily invite you to bring on the mere anecdotes! What do the audiences look like at jazz shows you’ve gone to recently? What are your recommendations for bridging the gap between audience and artist? Kids and Kalaparusha?
24 Responses to The Kids Are Alright
zerojake
September 11th, 2009 at 2:32 pm
Hahaha, leave it to d:o to mention Sunn in a jazz blog.I’m going to see them next weekend.
I’m a young musician, one who loves jazz but who also certainly tries to keep in touch with modern music, and to me it seems like a really obvious situation as to why ‘the kids don’t know what the jazz is all about,’ to quote a certain jello figurehead.
Most of the big music fans I know have a few jazz albums, usually kind of blue and giant steps and head hunters etc. But nobody talks about jazz because it just never comes up in modern culture.
Nobody goes to see jazz shows because jazz players only play at venues where young people feel uncomfortable. Even the venues i’ve played at, I feel like the clientele and management must not appreciate my clothes and hair and there’s nobody there anywhere close to my age other than the small clique of musicians around here that try to get to each others gigs. It’s not just a matter of the musicians drawing an older crowd, its just that jazz musicians never play at ‘my’ venues. Young people don’t want to sit down during concerts, they want to get close up to the musicians, but that kind of thing seems totally verboten at jazz shows. Outward shows of connection and grooving, loud yells of approval, anything more than polite clapping between solos or a quiet “yeah” at a particularly heated moment seem to be considered gauche. I remember distinctly one time where a group of young folks were playing, and they were really bringing it, and I acted like I might if I were at a local show and afterwards talking to them, they seemed kind of weirded out that I was so excited.
The worst thing is that from all I know, these cultural aspects of jazz concerts are totally baseless when it comes to history. Jazz was once the scary, dirty, energetic music of the youth… I’m pretty sure that I’d feel right at home in a dirty jazz bar in new orleans in the 30s, but who knows.
Bart
September 11th, 2009 at 3:14 pm
Excellent post, guys! This is my favorite Alice Coltrance album, and the Universal re-release CD that came out in 2002, while printed as a limited edition and now out-of-print, is still available at a lot of music stores and can be downloaded at Amazon or Itunes as MP3s or bought used at a reasonable price. Anyone who is a bit leery of some of the more adventurous avant-garde jazz but is fascinated by music that has a spiritual, psychedelic, peace and love kind of vibe, will not be disappointed in this recording.
Brad Nelson
September 11th, 2009 at 4:16 pm
Oh yeah, Universal Consciousness is a vicious war with the self in which both sides are well-armed and have manufactured a new drug which they will shoot into you and will make your head explode and your red, rapidly disassembling head will match the sky in its color and breadth.
But even headless, it is time to rise from the mud and reclaim yourself! For this is jazz as light! Let it penetrate your goddamn skin!
Tony
September 11th, 2009 at 6:17 pm
I’m a follower of the Downtown New York jazz and Eureopean Free Jazz scenes, and the concerts I go to have a nice variety of young and old, black and white, albeit never a huge audience. But this is an exception in the jazz world. The bulk of what’s left of the jazz audience IS older, whiter, less interested in developments in jazz, preferring the latest “tribute” album and the umpteenth remastering/reissue of some Blue Note album. The mainstream jazz mags are moribund and prefer to follow rather than lead. What needs to happen? Monopoly control of radio needs to be broken to create diversity of programming. Public radio needs to receive adequate financial support from the government , but also mandated to give more (much more) time to jazz, blues, etc (rather than try to emulate Clear Channel commercial readio). Radio is a vital, maybe the vital, medium to disseminate music to th epublic. Finally, more arts grants need to be made to musicians to carry on the art.
Charles
September 11th, 2009 at 7:33 pm
Nice post and welcome back!
Lincoln Center wants the kids? I am fairly certain they could care less about the kids, or anyone else who is not sufficiently “cultured” to appreciate their specific definition of jazz. I argue that Lincoln Center and institutions like them wagered that jazz was going to die in the commercial world and that the way to preserve it was to seek patronage outside of the commercial market. And that works. The more dead jazz appears to be, the more they can justify funding this culturally important work. The less it sells, the more like “art” it is going to appear and thus the easier it is to fit into a model of patronage based on European art music.
Didn’t Stanley Crouch once say (and I am very loosely paraphrasing here) that if you wanted to see concerts by artists you like, start your concert series! It’s good advice actually, and ultimately, hopefully, it will undermine their hijacking and attempted murder of the word “jazz”
zerojake
September 12th, 2009 at 2:05 am
Tony, I’ll agree on the grant aspect, but radio? Seriously?
The only people I know who listen to radio nowadays are either too old to know how to work an ipod, too ignorant to want to listen to music other than pop or alt-rock or whatever other corporate mainstream music, or just dont care about music at all and are listening for the sake of having music on.
Radio had a place when music wasn’t instantly accessible for free or nearly free almost instantly from any internet connection, but to myself and the rest of my generation, the idea of listening to what some dj wants to play (and then having to suffer through commercials) is stupid. We’re gonna listen to whatever we want, whenever we want it. We’re gonna have it without any commercials, without any interruptions, we’re gonna fast forward or rewind anything we feel like, we’re going to be in total control. We’re the DJs. Anything less is unacceptable.
Brandt
September 12th, 2009 at 1:27 pm
At last weekend’s Jazz Festival in Chicago, the audience for Fred Anderson and William Parker was huge. Probably disproportionately white for Chicago, and if appearances mean anything, fairly well off. And knowledgeable about out jazz, but that’s Chicago–a major festival featuring Parker, Anderson, Archie Shepp, and Jeff Parker on the main stage.
As for supporting jazz, supporting music in schools is a crucial component.
pdf
September 12th, 2009 at 6:51 pm
(Ha ha, the anti-spam word is “zorn.”)
A couple of quick questions:
1) Why don’t rock clubs book jazz acts as openers/co-headliners?
2) Why don’t rock BANDS take jazz acts on the road with them? Imagine how many new listeners would be brought on board if Sunn O))) was touring with, say, Vijay Iyer and Rudresh Mahanthappa.
As far as I know, there’s no law that says jazz groups have to play jazz clubs, and no law forbidding them from playing rock venues, or on rock-dominated bills. It’s just a matter of getting bookers and booking agents to open their minds a little bit, and pairing them up properly with the right kind of rock acts. I’m sure you could put Fieldwork on the same bill as Arcade Fire or the Decemberists and they’d be a hit.
Kai
September 12th, 2009 at 7:16 pm
I’m not attending concerts very often, been only to one jazz gig this year so far – and not in the USA, but in my native Germany. However, I was shocked to see a sea of white hair in front of the stage. Sure, I was happy that so many liked the music that I liked (I’m in my early 30′s, the band was Nils Wogram’s Trio, with the musicians being in their mid- to late 30′s). But I thought, if the musicians are so young and sound so fresh and look so cool, there should be some young people attracted by it.
pdf is right with his suggestion. Why don’t those rock bands who do actually show their appreciation for jazz not hire some jazz groups for their support? Actually, I think, for teens rock and hip-hop are really “cooler” than jazz, but those could nevertheless be an entrance – as they were for me. I got to love jazz because as a kid I loved NoMeansNo and Victims Family – and people in the punk rock scene sometimes claimed that their music has something to do with jazz. I couldn’t really see the link at that time, but I believed what others said, and thought: Well, if NoMeansNo and Victims Family have something to do with jazz, then jazz must be really cool. Let’s check it out…
lj
September 12th, 2009 at 7:25 pm
That approach worked with me (I’m 28): as a teenager listening to rock, I got interested in stuff that was farther and farther out. This led me to avant-garde free improv, and then I found my way back through the jazz canon, from Brotzmann to Basie.
Massimo Magee
September 13th, 2009 at 4:12 am
I’m a relatively young jazz listener, and also someone who makes music that is very much influenced by jazz, even if it might not necessarily be classified as such.
I agree with what zerojake said above about radio. If you want to reach the younger audience, the internet is the way to go. What’s more, in this age of filesharing and music piracy if you want to get some people listening, you’ve got to be prepared to start giving people some things for free. Having free releases up for download is a great way of getting people to dip their toe in, without having to risk money on it (which, for, say, a student, could be an important determining factor). Streaming previews can also work, but the implementation of that idea can often cause problems, and cause people to stop listening long before they’ve given the material a fair hearing.
There are lots of sites now offering great (usually out of print) jazz albums for free download, but these might be a little hard to find for the neophyte. It often seems that the only way to find them would be to already know what you are looking for. I think more jazz artists need to be prepared to have a greater internet presence if they want to get a share of the younger audience, and must also be prepared to make some of their music available for free to this audience, so they can get a feel for it.
Personally, I make quite a lot of my music available for free on the internet on my netlabel/blog (click my name, above, for the link), but then I’m in a position not to have to rely on my music for money, which, admittedly, is not a position that a lot of other people making jazz that I know are in. I still think an increased internet presence, and a few items (well-signposted and maybe even publicized) available for people to download for free would be an investment that would provide a significant return, if more people tried it. That and more venues to play in, of course……
scrien
September 14th, 2009 at 12:41 am
Surprised you didn’t mention a big reason AC has been getting a lot of attention lately. The DJ/producer Flying Lotus is her great-nephew Steven Ellison, and his (excellent) work, some of it sampling “Auntie’s Harp,” has had good press in the States and Europe, most of it mentioning AC.
This is one of the few blogs I read, and I’ve particularly appreciated the Sun Ra, Air, and AC tracks recently. Thanks.
Jim
September 14th, 2009 at 11:47 am
“Where’s the weeklong Electric Miles events? Why aren’t we taking advantage of the bridges that already exist?”
I wish I would have been exposed to Bitches or Jack Johnson as my first “jazz” albums. Being a rocker in high school and knowing full well I’d love jazz, it was hard to get into what my teachers were giving me — Dave Brubeck, Glenn Miller, etc. Still, if you want it, you gotta work for it. That is true not just for learning your instrument, but also for listening and finding music, too. It’s a full time (or part-time I guess) job, a daily struggle to find something new that turns you on.
Maybe I’ll ride my bike across high school campuses this week blaring Pharaoh’s Dance from a pair of those backpack speakers. That’ll change some minds… or at least turn some heads.
Les
September 14th, 2009 at 6:53 pm
You guys have hit the nail precisely on the head. The young fan base for jazz is there and ripe for the picking. It is only the labels and Balkanization of music that leads to the perception that the future of jazz is in trouble.
As a teen, I became interested in jazz, because of the subtle influence of Coltrane, electric Miles, and Jaco Pastorius on hard rock and metal.
Then as I became more comfortable with the language of jazz, I ventured further and further into the avant-garde.
I feel it is the same with the current generations whether they be primarily fans of hip-hop, electronica, or metal, I would hazard a guess that they have a passing knowledge or interest in jazz. And this interest plants the seeds for future enjoyment of the music.
As a related aside, it is my opinion that labels in music do more to hurt the enjoyment of music than anything. I know it is great to be able to find the type of music you want in it’s own section. However, it can blind one to great music in other categories. I remember hating “country” music, and then I heard Johnny Cash and Hank Williams, and recognized the passion and beauty of their music, regardless of the fact that it was country.
THe THruther
September 15th, 2009 at 1:49 am
Jass is dead.
And labels and music schools and grants aren’t going to fix it.
All the fire and experimentation and life you got from jass is elsewhere now. Oops.
Matt
September 15th, 2009 at 6:36 am
The last jazz show I went to was Jason Moran at the Village Vanguard and I’d say that the audience was about 60% Japanese. There were two black people, maybe about 10 white people and Steve Lehman. I’d say the average age was about mid to late-30′s though a surprising number of the Japanese audience members were pretty young. It was unclear whether they were dragged there by their jazz-loving parents or if they were there on their own and the older people were unrelated.
I’d also just like to say that I feel that if something is on the decline you should just let it go. It’s something we’re dealing very much with here in Quebec with the language issue. The government does everything it can to promote the french language and Quebecois culture (there are posters in the Metro promoting a fleur de lis label for french businesses thereby labeling non-french businesses by omission, etc.) but other cultures are always seeping it and eventually the local culture will evolve into something else. It can’t be stopped and neither can jazz’s evolution. There will probably always be people who love jazz but jazz didn’t always exist and it won’t be around forever, at least not as we know it or knew it. I think the best thing someone can do is just keep playing and sharing your love (and frustration, damn Four in One is really hard) of the music with those around you.
chris
September 15th, 2009 at 6:41 pm
i didn’t get into jazz for any particular reason, but i sure as hell didn’t get into it to be constantly stressing about whether it’s living or dieing… marketing and promotion, in every aspect, is all there is to it. People view it as old… possible rebranding needed? the word ‘jazz’ has insanely corny baggage. Movies like ‘Mo Better Blues’ were a nail in the coffin.
David Kennedy
September 16th, 2009 at 6:21 am
One of the biggest problems is not the graying audience but the fact that music that is clearly not jazz is regularly tagged as such – e.g. Amy Winehouse, Norah Jones.
Btw, can anyone tell me what the benefits would be of more people listening to more jazz?
godoggo
September 16th, 2009 at 9:33 am
I think Amy Winehouse is a jazz singer. I think she’s a great jazz singer.
cherise
September 16th, 2009 at 10:07 am
@David, I think one benefit of more people listening to jazz is that it’s easier for musicians we love to make a halfway decent living, record albums with more than a micro-budget, and actually play to audiences in more than three cities. Right now it’s difficult for jazz musicians to tour the U.S. b/c there aren’t venues b/c of a (perceived?) lack of audience. If you’re not the Bad Plus and playing rock venues, you’re s.o.l. And that’s a shame for all music fans.
@PDF – Personally I think you’re suggestion is spot on and that rock bands that are inspired by jazz should take jazz acts on the road with them. It’s past time for the music to break out of the two drink minimum scene and get to the people where it belongs.
Nice post guys, btw.
TSK
September 16th, 2009 at 9:39 pm
zerojake: <>
Please, gross generalization. If you’re talking about the young people whose idea of a concert is to stand for two hours packed shoulder to shoulder like beef shouting at each other over the headsplitting volume while they simultaneously text, I don’t think those people are an acoustic jazz audience, never mind the venue. It’s the other young people who matter here–the ones who know how to unitask.
Tom Gsteiger
September 22nd, 2009 at 12:01 pm
In the 70s there was a very hip Swiss band called OM (w/ Fredy Studer, Christy Doran, Urs Leimgruber and Bobbi Burri). Check out the album “OM – A Retrospective” on ECM! They called their music Electricjazz-Freemusic. I think they were mostly inspired by Free Jazz and Weather Report …
matt Lavelle
September 24th, 2009 at 11:05 pm
you guys have a GREAT IDEA,.in regards to using the bridges that already exist in regards to reaching
a younger audience,.BIG Live evil fan right here.Alot of famous people today found inspiration in jazz,.and its been going on a long time.JALC needs new leadership in this regard,.and Jazz needs a new spokesperson,.and/or the media has to stop looking to JALC as the definition of whats REALLY going on,.(right downtown sometimes to!).
Matt E.
September 30th, 2009 at 9:59 pm
Whoa, way late on this. But I’d just like to throw my two cents in to say that I’ve always found this tack to be some fallacious bullshit.
I live in DC, and there’s no shortage of ways for anyone — regardless of age, race, gender, creed, cashflow — to interact with the music. The record stores around here are teeming with Basie and Bennett, Coltrane and Miles, Ornette and Braxton; from cut-rate prices to collector’s items on the wall.
You can spend a paltry $30 to sit right overtop a wailing Sonny Rollins in one of the great halls of the Kennedy Center, or catch Happy Apple on the Millennium Stage in the foyer of that venerable institution for free.
Local free players get down before and during noise and electronic improv and drone rock acts at punk clubs like the Velvet Lounge, afrobeat bands play rock clubs with local MC’s and go-go bands.
There are great free shows at the feet of national monuments and museums, and nearly free ones put on by neighborhood Baptist churches.
And on any given night on U Street or 9th or in Adams Morgan, a group of people young and old, black and white and Asian and Latin are killing it on the bandstand while asking for but a pittance from your pocket and for you to treat the barkeep well.
Even the buskers at the metro station will spit out a rendition of Autumn Leaves that’ll leave you breathless as you hurry on to work.
For a city that’s trying to struggle to find a coherent identity amid the gentrification and the shitty baseball and everyone telling us we’re hip again just because the President now happens to be, jazz has almost become something of a rallying cry. Eleanor Holmes Norton said it introducing McCoy Tyner at last year’s Ellington Festival, “DC isn’t a political city. It’s a jazz city.”
Maybe bluster, sure. But it is Duke’s city, after all.